The book I read to research this post was Allies at Dieppe by Will Fowler which is an excellent book which I bought from kindle. This book tells of the landings by allied troops at Dieppe & the surrounding in an attempted D-day that went badly wrong. I’ll write a little bit about the reasons behind it. In Russia the russians had most of the german armed forces tied and Stalin was desperate to get the forces in the west to open up a new front to take pressure off them because the russians were suffering huge casualties. Stalin also threatened that if the british and americans didn’t co operate he would try and make a truce with the nazi’s. The british and americans were focusing on supplying the russians with what they needed and were suffering huge losses in the arctic convoys that took supplies upto Murmansk in Russia. Churchill suggested some landings in Norway which was relatively heavily guarded by nazi forces & Dieppe was seen as the lesser of 2 evils. Also around this time the americans gave the russians a $1,000 million loan on favourable terms that they could repay over 20 years. I think this book which in particular looks at the mistakes made is of particular interest to historians and soldiers. There is a funny story that nazi propaganda claimed the british were starving and one man offered the commando’s eggs and they thanked him but said they don’t need them at the moment.
Archive for the ‘stalin’ Category
Tags: arctic convoys, churchill, dieppe, history, military history, stalin, world war 2
At the end of world war 2 it became necessary to prosecute certain people for war crimes. Stalin was in favour of shooting the 50,000 worst offenders which churchill was deeply opposed to although he was in favour of shooting the worst offenders. He also thought if hitler survived the war he should get the electric chair. Many of the offenders were shot but as more and more war criminals were arrested it became necessary according to roosevelt to have a mass trial which was to become nuremberg. At one point it looked like it would only be the prisoners in US custody but the UK and USSR didn’t want to be left out. When the trials took place the defendants were housed in belsen an ex concentration camp. Many of them tried to commit suicide and this got so bad that a guard was assigned to each cell and there orders were to check on each inmate at least once a minute. Many of those found guilty were hanged but quite a lot were given life sentences. One interesting thing about the trial is that the US brought in conspiracy laws which were in US law especially for dealing with organised crime but hadn’t really been taken up by other countries at that time. An example of a conspiracy law is say someone is going to do a burglary and borrows a ladder if that person knows he is going to use it to commit burglary that person can be prosecuted. The book I read to research this post was Nuremberg evil on trial by James Owen which is an excellent book and I got it from the library.
The book I read to research this post was Lenin – Life and Legacy by Dmitri Volkogonov and it’s a good book which I bought from a car boot sale.
Lenin was born in a town called Simbirsk in 1870. In the book it says that Lenin was nearly as paranoid as Stalin especially in the last two years before he died. When he died it was rumoured it was syphyllis that killed him but it does say there’s evidence that it was a series of mild strokes and his neurosurgeon hinted that he would have been a bit irrational during the period he had the strokes. His illness was probably brought on by over work. He died at the age of 48.
Without Lenin’s prescence there would have probably been no revolution because Lenin had a gift for getting people riled up. I think after the revolution the general public were no better off and on top of that millions of them were sent to gulags in siberia so many were worse off.